Jump to content

Talk:Empire Leicester Square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I've added a little bit, but just how much can you expand an article like this? It's a cinema. It shows premiering movies. That's it. Lee M 00:02, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

It also has a lengthy history as a theatre. Kbthompson (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can anybody parafraze sentence about screen 2 - and add info about it's capacity - 349 seats.? --Pegazek 10:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Westminster, City and London Borough

[edit]

While this probably isn't the best place, Westminster would seem to be a London borough and also a City. The Westminster article says that it is under the Status heading of its infobox and London Government Act 1963 lists it as a Borough (as Borough 1). The London borough article itself also lists it as one. I'm not sure that this article should care in any event, so unless someone objects, I will be changing the opening sentence from

The Empire is a large cinema on the north side of Leicester Square, in the City of Westminster, a borough of London with city status.

to

The Empire is a large cinema on the north side of Leicester Square, in the City of Westminster, London.

Cheers JonoP 11:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The City of Westminster has the status of a London borough (LG Act 1963), it retains the title city from the former city of westminster, abolished in 1966. The City of London remains sui generis. Kbthompson (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While that may be true (and I have absolutely no reason to disbelieve you), my larger point (which perhaps was lost) is that an article on the Empire cinema (or indeed pretty much any article that isn't the City of Westminster article) isn't the place to go into the subtleties of the government of the City of Westminster, which is why I I came up with my alternative version. JonoP (talk) 09:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I quite agree. I try to include the name of the London Borough in every article - apart from the street it's the prime way to identify where it is. Another editor thought with the City of Westminster that that was insufficient and added 'a London bourough' to it. Someone else came along and changed it to 'a city that is also a borough of London' (although what the last bit is supposed to mean, no one knowns. I don't believe we should be tagging everything with an expanded address structure - but some people do.
I just thought of what to do, I'll add the theatre template to it. That should achieve clarity, if not satori ... Kbthompson (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Better? Kbthompson (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's good (the infobox mentions London, so you can get away with not having it in the main article. JonoP (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empire 4

[edit]

Is there a reference for the fourth screen being built? It almost certainly wont be happening in 2007, the only building work recently has been the new canopy (speaking of which, I will try and get a photo with it in), nothing inside - last time I was in there, the toilets were where they have always been. JonoP (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A quick google just shows a reference to the Empire 4 as the pub across the road! The only other thing would be to check the Westminster planning website, see if they have planning permission. Then it could be changed to 'proposed'. Next time I'm on the English Heritage website I'll try to see if the façade is listed. There are various references to the interior 'being gutted', they did turn the auditorium round in 1928 - so, I guess nothing much is left of 1880 ... they are references to a Wurlitzer, but no confirmation that it's still there ... By contrast the Talk of the Town is constructed within a 1907 theatre (which remains complete behind the panelling). Kbthompson (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

8 screens

[edit]

The Empire is now a 8 screen cinema (note: there is no screen 3), not sure when this happened? If you look at the layouts, seats, one might also question why too! Kjw (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually 8 (no screen 3, for some reason, may just be under refurbishment). To my mind they seem to be the size of a large living room! Only 26-48 seats. Any details of the refurb would be useful. I adjusted the infobox, but not the text. Kbthompson (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

screen size of Empire 1?

[edit]

It is mentioned in the article, that the screen size of Empire 1 has been expanded by 4 meters but it does not say anywhere what the actual screen size is. --200.9.3.65 (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1962 reopening film

[edit]

I have corrected the erroneous information that the rebuilt Empire reopened with Mutiny On the Bounty. That film opened at the Royalty Theatre (which MGM were running at the time). The Empire reopened with Jumbo (aka Billy Rose's Jumbo).Ambak51 (talk) 13:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empire, Leicester Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empire, Leicester Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Empire, Leicester Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Empire, Leicester Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Empire_Leicester_Square&oldid=1264083983"